Which methods are commonly used to resolve construction disputes?

The methods commonly used to resolve construction disputes primarily include negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. Each of these methods serves a unique purpose in dispute resolution.

Negotiation is often the first step, allowing parties to communicate their issues directly and attempt to reach a mutually agreeable solution without outside intervention. It is typically the least formal approach and aims to preserve relationships between the parties.

Mediation introduces a neutral third party who facilitates communication and helps the disputing parties find common ground. The mediator does not make decisions for the parties but instead assists them in working collaboratively toward a resolution.

Arbitration is more formal and involves a third party who makes a binding decision based on the evidence presented. This method is often used when parties agree in advance to arbitrate their disputes rather than taking them to court.

Litigation, the most formal dispute resolution method, involves taking legal action through the court system. It is typically considered a last resort due to its time-consuming nature and costs.

While litigation and arbitration are indeed common methods, they do not encompass the full range of options available, which makes the first choice the most comprehensive and accurate representation of how construction disputes can be resolved.